The U.S. government has ordered Anthropic to suspend access to its two most powerful AI models, Fable 5 and Mythos 5, citing national security concerns. The fallout landed squarely on European users who had no warning – and no say.
The directive, issued Friday, June 12, invokes export control authority to bar all foreign nationals from accessing the models – whether inside or outside the U.S., including Anthropic’s own foreign-national employees. To ensure compliance the tech giant announced it would “abruptly disable” the models for all users globally.
Anthropic says it disagrees with the move. While the government cited a potential jailbreak – a method of bypassing the model’s safeguards – the company argues the vulnerability is narrow, non-universal, and available in other publicly deployed models including OpenAI’s GPT-5.5.
Access to all other Anthropic models remains unaffected
For Europe, the implications go beyond the immediate service disruption. The European Commission confirmed it is assessing the practical impact on European users and organisations that rely on these AI services.
Commission spokesperson Thomas Reigner was pointed in his response: measures of this kind “should not be discriminatory against partners,” he said. The episode, Reigner added, is “a further illustration of why Europe needs to strengthen its technological sovereignty.”
The episode has reignited a debate that Brussels has been having for years, albeit with a new urgency. Some analysts argue the Trump administration primarily needed a mechanism to shut down access to the model for everyone – including U.S. citizens – and export controls were simply the most legally available tool.
That reading is not reassuring for Europe: if U.S. domestic AI governance increasingly relies on export control law as a blunt instrument, allied nations become collateral damage.
The broader context, however, is one of structural dependence. As the latest Stanford index shows, the top tier of global AI is a U.S.-China affair, with no European model in sight. And, according to Bruegel researchers, whoever controls frontier AI infrastructure sets the economic and strategic terms by which others access it.
This week’s disruption could accelerate EU investment in homegrown AI capacity – or simply reinforce that the region’s tech sovereignty gap is too large to close quickly.
Featured image: via Polites News
Author: Polites News
Creative Commons Licenses
